Re: Fragmentation for headers: why jumbo != continuation.

In message <CAP+FsNesMqqDa+QyV_c_sg8fud=DPi0PqxGG=W5nLV2_CS1hsg@mail.gmail.com>, Roberto Peon wri
tes:

>Unfortunately not true-- the backend can't have the same compressor state
>as the proxy unless the proxy is doing a 1:1 connection mapping (which only
>happens sometimes).

If the backend compresses without relying on the state it can (ie: static
set and huffman all the way)

It obviously gives inferior compression, but it will work.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 09:04:18 UTC