- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:29:18 +0100
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I’ve heard at least one other person bring up this scenario recently (forget who), FWIW. We should clarify, I think. On 24 Sep 2014, at 5:11 pm, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: >> While I understand the scenario, it seems more appropriate for the client to send the RST_STREAM(OK) if it decides to abort sending the rest of the body. > > I think that should be valid as well. Basically I think either should > be able to tear down the stream via RST_STREAM(OK) without the other > considering it an error, and that the text should be clarified to make > it explicit. > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 17:29:47 UTC