- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:37:13 +0000
- To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
- cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAPyZ6=KnoDue9de0qg=nqGnsgkJmCYBzu1NMqbxpAN39P7rw=w@mail.gmail.com>, Tatsuhiro Tsujik awa writes: >> Designing the protocol for only the lowest bandwidths is not a goal. >> >Multiple DATA frames can consume large bandwidth too and thereby deliver >large data quickly. And they will have multiple the overhead of a single larger frame. >So the goal of HTTP/2 is to design it for low power embedded devices? The goal, as I understood it, is to design a protocol that will be generally usable. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 16:59:55 UTC