- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:14:25 -0500
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
On Jul 15, 2014, at 5:50 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > If we make 33.Value and 36.Value mean "Integer time_t follows" > (using 4.1.1's integer format), we will probably shave 10 bytes of > each request and response. Whatever happened with this idea? Searching my archives I couldn’t find it getting rejected. I also don’t see an issue filed for it. It would be a nice perf boost to be able to do calculations against time_t vs parsing. -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 19:15:32 UTC