Re: Options for CONTINUATION-related issues

On 16 July 2014 17:08, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Are there any other realistic (i.e., capable of achieving consensus, NOT
> just your favourite approach) options that we should be considering?


hmmmm I am probably being unrealistic.... but let's tilt at this windmill

c) Remove CONTINUATION from the specification, allow HEADERS to be
fragmented and add a new setting that advises the maximum header set size
(i.e,. uncompressed) a peer is willing to receive (but might not imply
PROTOCOL_ERROR or STREAM_ERROR on receipt).


cheers


-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.