Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues

On 2014–07–21, at 3:00 AM, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:

> My reading of the WG is that the best we’re going to do for consensus here is option (b) — keeping continuation, and adding an advisory setting for the largest uncompressed header set that a recipient is willing to accept. 
> We can split these up into separate decisions if people violently disagree; if not, I think we can stop discussing CONTINUATION.
> Does anyone have further information to addd? If not, will mark as editor-ready.

Why were the decisions balloted together in the first place? I never saw how compressed vs. uncompressed implied CONTINUATION vs. jumbo-only. There is little support for a declared, post-compression limit, so the results are skewed.

Received on Sunday, 20 July 2014 21:47:59 UTC