On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:44 PM, <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote: > > Patrick said: > A multiplexed protocol doesn't work without prioritization. Or rather, it > ends up worse than what we currently have. > > Martin said that. I do concur. > If you truly believe that, seems like you would want to explicitly state > that in the spec. Otherwise you're setting up implementors for failure. > > imo its a reasonable editorial suggestion... if you provide a pull request the editor can decide. it would be fine by me either way. A specification does not need to discuss every implication of the protocol as if it were a text book but it obviously carries some non normative language to help the reader put it all in context. I tend to prefer minimalism in the core document, but that's not the in vogue style right now. The editor should decide.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 20:04:28 UTC