- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:44:50 -0700
- To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, William Chow <wchow@mobolize.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 22 August 2014 10:30, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > "While the stream identified by the promised stream ID is still open" - meaning that as long as the client has asked for it before the server has finished sending it? That's a fairly small amount of time, particularly if the resource is very small, but sounds like a good starting point. How would people feel if I removed that clause. They can be considered validated. The period over which that validation applies is then no different to a regular request/response exchange, which suffers all of the same sorts of thorny and ambiguous validity issues. (i.e., By avoiding an attempt to define validity expressly, we're not making it worse, even if we're not tackling the issue fully.)
Received on Monday, 25 August 2014 16:45:19 UTC