Re: #541: CONTINUATION

In message <6fc43f2a8f1f1ae53aed7ae0e02dfd3e.1404369751@squirrel.mail>, "Walter H." writes:
>On Wed, July 2, 2014 14:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> PPS:
>>     I'm looking for co-authors for a jumboframe extension draft.
>
>this is a mistake by design, because, jumbo frames are an extension to
>Ethernet, and this is some layer deeper and has nothing to do with http,
>nor with tcp/ip itself;

Uhm, we're talking about HTTP/2 frames, not ethernet frames.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 07:43:47 UTC