- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:48:50 +1200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On 25/07/2014 5:26 a.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > Er, :authority? Is routinely omitted in HTTP/1.0 port 80 requests without Host: header. Recipient is required to assume itself. Amos > > On 24 Jul 2014, at 11:49 am, Michael Sweet wrote: > >> I think for OPTIONS the client can omit all but the :method pseudo header. In any case, I'm +1 on clarifying this in the spec, particularly for "OPTIONS *". >> >> On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> >>> On 24 July 2014 08:14, Amos Jeffries wrote: >>>> IMHO it be more correct to say simply that :path may be omitted on >>>> OPTIONS and represents a request for "*" asterisk-form? as opposed to a >>>> 0-length :path field which represents the path-empty case. >>> >>> That would permit a more correct reconstruction of the original 1.1 request. >>> >>> I think that I need a second opinion before making such a change. What >>> do others think? >>> >> >> _________________________________________________________ >> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 23:49:35 UTC