W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

RE: HPACK WGLC feedback

From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:49:51 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E5333A7BC9@ADELE.crf.canon.fr>
It's the remnant of an evolution process that didn't get far enough. I'm going to change this if it's not too much trouble.

Hervé.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w@1wt.eu]
> Sent: dimanche 31 août 2014 17:41
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: HTTP Working Group
> Subject: Re: HPACK WGLC feedback
> 
> Hi Julian
> 
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 03:46:14PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > so I just read this (the current version checked into git) end-to-end,
> > and don't have any substantial comments. I might if I actually tried to
> > implement it, though.
> >
> > The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called
> > "static table" and "header table" is very confusing. Is there a reason
> > why it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?
> 
> I agree with you, and it's how I noted it on paper while thinking about
> implementation, because I had the same concerns.
> 
> Willy
> 
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 07:50:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC