- From: Jeroen de Borst <J.deBorst@F5.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:23:54 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Does adding :query imply that seeing a Œ?¹ in :path now requires error handling? Jeroen On 7/21/14, 10:16 AM, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >In message <4DD79E4D-6340-4181-BB20-E981D280CCFB@mnot.net>, Mark >Nottingham wri >tes: > >>At this point I'm concerned enough about getting through our security >>review that I'm inclined not to do this; the possible benefit (which >>the WG seems open to, if not enthusiastic about) doesn't appear to be >>worth the risk (both that to the actual security of people using the >>protocol, and the risk of not making it through our security reviews). > >I would like to have some idea about the compression gain before >we make up our mind. > >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >incompetence. >
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:24:24 UTC