- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:04:08 -0500
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:40 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > On 23 September 2014 08:55, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > One thing that I’ve heard is requiring clients to offer the “good” suites first, to promote interop. Does anyone see a downside to doing that? > > I really don't understand the process of last call and working code if when an interop problem is discovered the response is that "it's all been discussed before so no changes are possible”! Well, isn’t consensus required to leave last call? -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 00:04:38 UTC