- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:47:05 -0700
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeLJ2Krzut3mVwdGGcteXuR7-B+cHg5rg3T--y_CxNsGA@mail.gmail.com>
This conversation is quickly becoming unproductive and diverging from the technical issues. Please refrain from venomous speech like 'follow you and your little red wagon'. If you have a different opinion, state it. If you have a constructive criticism, say it. If you intend to stir the pot for other reasons, please shut the hell up. -=R On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message < > CAOdDvNrOYevs8Mu2gQnUqDr8-_kn0Mfm16uGyQgoZ6EADMnWZw@mail.gmail.com> > , Patrick McManus writes: > > >To clarify my statements, I indicated that the world is moving beyond > >HTTP/1 - the data shows that. > > I think you suffer badly from selection bias when you make this > statement. > > *Your* world may be moving in that direction, but there are huge > swatches of HTTP traffic that doesn't seem to follow you and your > little red wagon. > > IMO this effect has been present throughout, where representatives > from a small number of large sites seem to confuse their site and > other sites of the kind with "the world". > > The whole "Mandatory TLS" is probably where we saw this most clearly: > > The advocates of "Mandatory TLS" all seem to be from sites which > require user login and which have privacy data and concerns. > > But those sites are not even close to carrying 50% of the HTTP > traffic in the net today: The majority of traffic is public > without privacy concerns that is not already revealed by the > existence of the TCP connection in the first place. > > I share the anti-NSA sentiment as much as the next guy, but there > is never going to be a sane case to be made why CNN or BBC's > frontpage has to suffer the huge overhead of TLS. > > Nor is there any sane architectural argument to be made why > the emergency-services web-pages of national governments > should risk DoS'ing themselves with TLS during a catastrophy. > > And there is no way the porn industry is ever going to fork out > money for TLS hardware for the 30+% of the total HTTP traffic they > serve. > > So yes, you may *think* you have felt the world move, but I think > it is just the faulty suspension of your office-chair. > > Poul-Henning > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 17:47:33 UTC