- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:59:51 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 00:00:19 UTC
On 24 September 2014 02:31, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > I've prepared a pull request that tightens the restrictions on frame sizes. > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/616 > > Any objections to this change? It's marked editorial in the tracker, > but we're at a stage now that I think that substantive changes even as > minor as this need to be raised here. I'll hold this for a while and > pull this in unless I hear screams. > > Just a question on specific word usage: where you have "A ... ​frame of a length other than ..." I'd have used "... frame with a length ...". It hints a bit more strongly that the "length" to which we refer is the field -- which, as was mentioned in a thread a while back, is actually the length of the payload, not the length of the frame *per se*. That's just me, though. If you disagree, I'm happy with the change. (Also I haven't scanned for other usages, to see if that would introduce inconsistency or an annoyingly large changeset.) -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 00:00:19 UTC