W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frames, Continuations, Flow Control, and changing HPACK

From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:12:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH_hAJHb4GbYy5ze43z4fk1q81iCpcC2+QKy3TNZB69FOtGQTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 July 2014 02:39, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Please be specific about what you like about this proposal --
> a) Getting rid of the reference set (Jeff's "1", maybe "4") is a good idea, and complementary to Greg (et al)'s proposal
> b) This complete set of changes is a preferable alternative to Greg (et al)'s proposal
> c) Don't know, need to talk more.

I'm at a). I won't miss the reference set. If we're genuinely worried
about whether the loss of the reference set is a time-bomb, I suggest
we consider PHK's negotiation of header compression proposal.
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 07:13:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:36 UTC