- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:52:33 +0000
- To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
- cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
In message <CAPyZ6=Jpe8q5Q0OSVy=mV=JyX4MP4EVWYVxat1OkgPjpuR=KLg@mail.gmail.com>, Tatsuhiro Tsujik awa writes: >Are you saying that we should separate PRIORITY as standalone document and >be referenced from h2 core spec? Then it is not an *extension* RFC. They >are in core spec but just in separate documents, so as the HPACK. Purely from a textual point of view, that would be a good idea no matter what status the priority stuff gets. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 14:52:56 UTC