Re: #536: clarify extensibility for :pseudo header fields

On 1 July 2014 23:31, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
>> In other words:  Please limit :headers to the ones in and
>> and make attempts to smuggle any other :header through a hard protocol error.
> +1

I think that I've seen enough support for this approach, so I'll
prepare a change that says exactly that.

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 16:37:36 UTC