Re: PUSH_PROMISE and load balancers

On 26 September 2014 08:21, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know there are ways to work around it, but it seems sub-optimal to need to
> maintain two separate connection pools for push enabled vs non-push enabled
> clients, especially when it seems to be easy to fix on a protocol level.

It's still strictly better than HTTP/1.1.

Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 07:32:39 UTC