- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:23:49 +0000
- To: William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>
- cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAA4WUYhOu0tW_9vSJ4wcLh+V=y9h-FfdZjw8Y2kqLp3Bhkcugg@mail.gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGF uICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes: >The impetus is because I've received word of MITM >proxies that plan to do deep inspection of HTTP/2. > [...] >Therefore, I think it's in our >interest to make sure that whatever part of the protocol we think is >important to preserve for use should be actively exercised. And what if the MITM proxies disagree with you about which parts of the standard deserve to work and block some of them ? What will you do ? Pop-up: "EXAMPLE.COM don't agree with Jason Greene about HTTP/2 scope" ? Penalize them by deliberately slowing down their traffic ? It's a much better idea to make the core protocol so simple that all bits of it are naturally exercised. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 21:24:12 UTC