Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

On Jul 17, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <0355A0F3-2FCC-4713-9851-1867529B76F8@apple.com>, Michael Sweet writes:
> 
>> I'd just call the flag "EXPECT_WINDOW_UPDATE" and document that it
>> corresponds to the Expect: 100-continue semantics of HTTP/1.1.
> 
> Works for me.
> 
>> We'll still need to define the HTTP/1.1 gateway behavior, e.g., a 2.0 to
>> 1.1 gateway needs to implement a timeout that sends a WINDOW_UPDATE
>> frame if it doesn't see a 100 response in a timely manner.
> 
> The HTTP/1.1 spec already tells you that.

As a HTTP/1.1 client, not as a HTTP/2 gateway.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 15:39:05 UTC