- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:56:33 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABkgnnUihXBz1fz6YH1a3hQAToEeLOdaiZbU1uwtjfxV3Dr-iA@mail.gmail.com>, Martin Thomson w rites: >On 10 July 2014 11:53, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> Same ways usual: Use SETTINGS to tell what you support, let the >> other end decide what to send. Minimum compliance MUST takes care >> of interop. > >Smells like negotiation to me, so you need anything reserved. All good. That is not a negotiation, that is an announcement of capability. (If you want to see what negotiation looks like, stare at a PPP connection trying to get its act together.) And please notice that all I asked for was that we reserved some bits, not that we do the entire mechanism now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 19:56:58 UTC