Re: Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-nottingham-http-patch-status-00.txt>

So long as the integrity check is optional, that would be fine... it
just won't work with some patch formats (e.g. JSON Merge Patch [1] ).


On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Martin Thomson
<> wrote:
> On 11 September 2014 07:16, Poul-Henning Kamp <> wrote:
>> At the very least, if we do this, some kind of integrity check (ie:
>> a MD5 checksum or similar) should be included in the scheme, so
>> that the client can check that the patch operation gave the right
>> result.
> Yes.  ETag doesn't cut it for this.

Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 14:40:11 UTC