W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: HTTP/2 and Pervasive Monitoring

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:03:14 +0000
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8622.1408147394@critter.freebsd.dk>
--------
In message <CAH_y2NHOspsVugNZZgvD3XMZ522PzNkTRMS1dapcRDWQCL5ZsQ@mail.gmail.com>
, Greg Wilkins writes:

>ie the overwhelming response to BCP188 should be that this is not a problem
>we can fix on our own, but we are prepared to be part of the solution.

Agreed, but I think we should also point out that defending against
the 'pervasive' aspect is much cheaper than "real" privacy.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 00:03:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC