W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:40:28 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NEekpgDNO+OsDELarcSi3nn72gHb98L9R66TntcD9bUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Is there a specific use-case motivating this additional header?   ie are
there situations that a proxy can use this to do more than just log/debug a

I'm certainly not opposed to having the additional information that this
header provides, but I'd like to know what advantage there is for a client
to include the header.  If there is none, then it is not likely to be sent.


Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:40:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 9 September 2019 17:48:20 UTC