- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:54:00 -0700
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, "FOSSATI, Thomas (Thomas)" <thomas.fossati@alcatel-lucent.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 30 September 2014 16:46, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > Sorry to rain on the rhetorical games, but no, 9.2.2 (perhaps > a little clumsily) just seems to me to try reflect where TLS1.3 > is heading towards. Having HTTP/2.0 and TLS1.3 heading in the > same direction seems eminently reasonable to me at least. I'm > sure that could be achieved in other ways, but that kind of > consistency seems to me to be a laudable goal for both working > groups, both specification and both sets of implementations > and deployments. Yep, that is the intent precisely. None of the choices reflected there, with the possible exception of the MUST implement cipher suite, were made by this working group, they are just copying choices made in TLS.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 23:54:29 UTC