Re: HPACK WGLC feedback

Hi Julian

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 03:46:14PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi there,
> so I just read this (the current version checked into git) end-to-end, 
> and don't have any substantial comments. I might if I actually tried to 
> implement it, though.
> The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called 
> "static table" and "header table" is very confusing. Is there a reason 
> why it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?

I agree with you, and it's how I noted it on paper while thinking about
implementation, because I had the same concerns.


Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 15:41:12 UTC