- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:36:44 +0200
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:56:28PM +1000, Greg Wilkins wrote: > Willy, > > and just some more data for you, here is the frequencies broken up by > field name and encoding type. Thanks for this break-down and the other one. You convinced me :-) > Kind of suggests that I shouldn't be > putting content-length into the header table... > at least not for general values: (...) That's a good point indeed since there's little chance it will remain identical across multiple messages, so that would needlessly pollute the header table after several responses. In practice, if responses are looking similar and all headers fit into the dynamic table, it should have no impact since each name:value pair will not be reused and will be automatically evicted. Best regards, Willy
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 07:37:08 UTC