- From: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:19:58 -0400
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 02:20:24 UTC
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > Fair enough. I'll read it more thoroughly tomorrow. Note that the happy > eyeballs for ipv6 is different, because origins have to opt into serving > AAAA responses. They get to make that latency tradeoff decision themselves, > rather than Chrome version X launching and being slower for all websites. > I'm not sure how I see the difference between this vs AAAA responses with happy eyeballs? In both cases for websites that don't have the records you have to issue both queries and wait at least some time for an authoritative and cacheable NXDOMAIN or NOERROR back. And in both cases you start off with fairly few names actually having the record, with that shifting over time as adoption grows. Erik
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 02:20:24 UTC