- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:09:36 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 23 September 2014 01:50, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> The other is making all of 9.2.2 (and maybe 9.2.1) specific to TLS 1.2; i.e., to let TLS 1.3 and beyond control their own destiny. > That sounds like a good idea in any case (independently of whether it > addresses Greg's concerns wrt TLS 1.2). Given that TLS have already agreed to make the same restrictions (aside from mandatory to implement cipher suite) that 9.2.2 makes, I see only upside to this. The only restriction that seems like it could be special is the SNI one, for which I will create a special exclusion. See here: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/615
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 10:10:04 UTC