- From: Peter Ghosh <peter@ghosh.us>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:29:57 -0400
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMZxyqAQrxYGy1HxQ3bgyxak=xdqGKiAowQsv6eH7c5OfAf6mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Help On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <CABaLYCs4a= > zidQac0+gVHdLqoXfgxeRNV2NhakFQSMySK_XxKg@mail.gmail.com <javascript:;>> > , Mike Belshe writes: > > >We learned that transport > >protocols had an upgrade problem, but application protocols did not. > > So why is FF and Chromium not supporting Upgrade: ? > > >So we should all feel great about this - multiplexed streams were trapped > >for over a decade inside SCTP, and h2 is finally unlocking it for http. > > This is a huge learn-from-history victory. > > That is very much a matter of perspective. > > Taking the fight and using HTTP to push SCTP adoption, would have given > us so much more than than the current drafts erzats-framing does. > > Anycast for instance. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > -- ================= Peter Ghosh 267.471.2451 Mobile peter@ghosh.us
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 12:30:24 UTC