- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:06:08 -0500
- To: K.Morgan@iaea.org
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
This proposal addresses my concerns, so would of course be in favor. On Jul 2, 2014, at 2:51 PM, K.Morgan@iaea.org wrote: > I'd like to propose yet another option to Mark's list of options for dealing with the "CONTINUATION issue". > > Make it an extension. > > In NYC several people mentioned that if we add extensibility, we should have an extension(s) right from the start that are used. CONTINUATION IMO is a good option for an extension. > > Here is the CONTINUATION extension draft: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-johndoe-http2-large-header-blocks-00.txt > > Here is the pull request to remove CONTINUATION from the core h2 draft: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/547 > > -keith > > This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. > -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 20:06:38 UTC