- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:58:16 -0700
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 16 July 2014 08:02, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > Notice that I'm proposing a unsigned 32 bit, to be Y2038 > compliant. I realize that it's going to be less efficient, but the regular HPACK numeric encoding with a 0-bit prefix will be more regular (and not need the string exception). At a cost to regularity. This is a slippery slope; are we really going there?
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:58:44 UTC