- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:26:32 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
Seems reasonable to me. Any further comment - especially (but not exclusively) from the TLS community? Regards, On 23 Sep 2014, at 5:43 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > Regarding https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/602 > > I draw your attention to > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-padding-03#section-3, which > makes the same requirements on padding that the current draft does: > that is, must be zero, no requirements to enforce this at the receiver > (though servers MAY validate this, which is as effective as a MUST in > ensuring compliance). I hold that Adam and the numerous reviewers of > this draft from the TLS community collectively know more about this > than I could ever hope to, and suggest that we defer to their > collective judgment. > > I would like to close issue #602 with the single change included in > the following PR: > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/617 > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 10:26:59 UTC