W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: HPACK WGLC feedback

From: Pavel Rappo <pavel.rappo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:00:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAChcVumgZ-Um3eVJ3z3GwfOhmeUv_U9JchGZDbLAe9nSbMT5kA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called
"static table" and "header table" is very confusing.
> Is there a reason why it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?

​+1 That's exactly how I named corresponding classes in my implementation.​



On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> so I just read this (the current version checked into git) end-to-end, and
> don't have any substantial comments. I might if I actually tried to
> implement it, though.
>
> The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called
> "static table" and "header table" is very confusing. Is there a reason why
> it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 10:01:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC