- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 23:15:12 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 21:15:48 UTC
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Mark Nottingham wrote: > 0) the status quo > > 1) <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/544> and variants thereof > (e.g., not including CONTINUATION in flow control; alternative syntaxes) > > 2) limiting header sizes to 16K (HPACK’d) in HTTP/2, as per PHK’s suggestion > > There’s also another implicit option; > > 3) We can’t know until we get substantial interop and deployment experience > with draft-13. > > I’d like to ask the implementers (as identified on the CC: line) what their > preferences are, and what they can’t live with. I can live with either way. My order of preference is 0, 1, 2. But yes, we will of course know more at (3). -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 21:15:48 UTC