Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues) from Martin Thomson on 2014-07-18 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:16:42 -0700
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUJ9PKckAS7xwT+irdgLgZ_caxZeaCtiuaO20b2MrHmqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 18 July 2014 12:13, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Option B doesn't state that CONTINUATION are only used after a full
> header frame so it does not completely solve the issue.

It doesn't.  I don't believe that option is on the table.

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 19:17:09 UTC