Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt

In message <53C55903.3040906@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>On 2014-07-15 17:52, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


>> But with a view to the future, all they need to do is shift the
>> sensitive part of the data to the :query side, and they'll fine.
>
>Making this depend on path vs query is artificial and doesn't reflect 
>how people use URIs.

Now ?

Well, sort of...

But if we start to educate them about this split now, maybe we can do something
which will really improve privacy when we get to HTTP/3.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 16:43:09 UTC