Re: http/2 and "extensions"

On 15 July 2014 10:41, James M Snell <> wrote:
> all extensions going to be optional-to-implement[?]

all extensions ARE going to be optional-to-implement.

You can't rely on other implementations supporting something that they
don't know about.  The extensibility features of HTTP (header fields,
content types) are available if you want something end-to-end.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:55:07 UTC