- From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:27:38 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 04:35:29 +0200, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2014–07–02, at 10:18 AM, Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org> wrote: > >> Changing "Connection: close" to "nnCoection: close" is something I have >> seen some "zero copy" proxies do when they wanted to remove the >> connection header. The theory is you just load a 32 bit "Conn", rotate >> it 16 bits to "nnCo", put it back, and rely on the upstream server to >> ignore it as an unrecognized header. > > Hmm, if it was a convention among several implementations at the time, > perhaps it should be recorded in the standard. /s > I have more often seen it overwritten. Xonnection: close or XXXXXXXXXX: close. /Martin Nilsson -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 08:28:08 UTC