Re: #541: CONTINUATION

On Thu, July 3, 2014 09:43, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <6fc43f2a8f1f1ae53aed7ae0e02dfd3e.1404369751@squirrel.mail>,
> "Walter H." writes:
>>On Wed, July 2, 2014 14:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>
>>> PPS:
>>>     I'm looking for co-authors for a jumboframe extension draft.
>>
>>this is a mistake by design, because, jumbo frames are an extension to
>>Ethernet, and this is some layer deeper and has nothing to do with http,
>>nor with tcp/ip itself;
>
> Uhm, we're talking about HTTP/2 frames, not ethernet frames.

that doesn't prevent you of making a mistake by design;
because a HTTP/2 frame can be of ANY size and so it makes no sense of
handling "jumbo http/2 frames";
its the lower layer that handles jumbo frames and NOT HTTP itself;

Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 08:02:00 UTC