On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 July 2014 22:30, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > It sounds like we've converged on getting rid of END_SEGMENT. I've > marked it as editor-ready. > > Since we're removing affordances for websockets, can I handle #557 at > the same time. Not by adding METADATA, but by removing random, > semantic-free HEADERS frames. > I'd be OK with this. No websocket affordances, no non-semantic HEADERS, no problem! Seriously, though, there's no particular need now to send HEADERS frames at random points during a stream's lifecycle (after the initial HEADER/CONTINUATION block, of course). Why allow it at all? Make it a GOAWAY-able (or at least RST_STREAM-able) offense.
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 21:20:55 UTC