Re: #529: Working around concurrency limits

On 2014-07-02 17:16, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <>
> As I just mentioned in the issue, we already limit the requirement to
> a SHOULD here, allowing proxies to open more connections if they feel
> it necessary (and indeed, this isn't something we can really test
> for).
> Do we need to do more than that, or can we close the issue?

IMHO, close. The SHOULD has sufficient emphasis against doing it 
casually, while allowing for proxies and others if/when actually 


Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 09:22:24 UTC