- From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 07:07:45 +1000
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 21:08:14 UTC
I'm still very much in favour of the switch. It has resulted in good code simplications and enabled several optimisations. I understand Jeff's concern, but essentially one size doesn't fit all and I think Jeff's use-case is not the norm. But even for Jeff's usecase, h2 headers should be far better than h1. cheers On 27 September 2014 02:05, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > FWIW I am still opposed to this having changed in the first place as I > have to deal with lots and lots of custom headers. > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/578> > > > > This hasn’t seen much discussion on list, and no one seems to have > complained about it beyond Jeff. > > > > Does anyone want to argue for changing this, or should we WONTFIX? > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 21:08:14 UTC