Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)

On 21 July 2014 06:27, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> These I expect the editor to address; if people have suggestions after seeing how Martin incorporates the resolutions, I’m sure he’d be glad to have input.

Concrete proposals for Section 10.5.1 are welcome, but I believe that
there is text covering the problem already.

http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#rfc.section.10.5.1

I've no doubt that this can be improved.  As always, I prefer pull requests.

Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 13:35:32 UTC