Re: Striving for Compromise (Consensus?)

On 11 July 2014 11:35, Jason Greene <> wrote:
> Ok in that case, Roberto’s analysis does not prove what you say it does.

I'm pretty sure that it does.

This point:
> The current design handles this fairly well, at most one set of headers can
> be incomplete at any point in time (sending a large number of incomplete
> headers and keeping most of them incomplete most of the time is an
> excellent attack vector, which the design currently precludes).

Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 18:39:05 UTC