- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:39:51 -0700
- To: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 28 August 2014 08:56, Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > However, hypothetically it may contain special handling for the request line > and could correctly issue a 505 via HTTP/1.1, with enhancement. I'll point out that there's nothing correct about the preface we send, so any behaviour that is immediately obvious as a failure, like dropping the connection, or something like 505, is OK here. The key is to avoid misleading the client into thinking that its assumption of HTTP/2 support was correct. Generating a valid HTTP/2 GOAWAY, with all the lead-in, is probably the best way to avoid this, assuming that the client understands the code we choose. (Mike, that's an argument for resolving this issue now rather than later; I'll follow up on that.)
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 18:40:19 UTC