Re: CRLF requirement

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 01:38:36 +0200, Carsten Bormann <> wrote:

> On 02 Jul 2014, at 01:18, Martin Nilsson <> wrote:
>> bug
> Indeed.
> (Curious: Which vintage was that bug report?
> And was the bug introduced by the proxy or was that from the origin  
> server?)

The vintage is 2009. I would assume that the proxy (that scrambled the  
connection header), received a header block composed with \r and \r\r. It  
parsed it, modified it and then glued it together and botched the header  
termination sequence.

I just checked, and the URL in question responds with sane HTTP now.

/Martin Nilsson

Using Opera's revolutionary email client:

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 00:01:44 UTC