- From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:40:11 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Any reason why load-balancers aren’t in this discussion? With more end-to-end security coming in place, load balancers are starting to have similar or even more complex challenges. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com On Jul 3, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > FYI. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt >> Date: 4 July 2014 4:37:12 pm AEST >> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem >> Revision: 01 >> Title: Problems with Proxies in HTTP >> Document date: 2014-07-04 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 16 >> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem/ >> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01 >> Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-01 >> >> Abstract: >> This document discusses the use and configuration of proxies in HTTP, >> pointing out problems in the currently deployed Web infrastructure >> along the way. It then offers a few principles to base further >> discussion upon, and lists some potential avenues for further >> exploration. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 18:40:44 UTC