- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:14:46 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: "William Chan (ιζΊζ)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <F19D7D32-4264-423A-8B9B-F6F9036ACFEE@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham writes: >I appreciate you're concerned about the CONTINUATION issue, but using it >to derail other discussions isn't appropriate. This is very much a discussion about CONTINUATION: The proposal is to abuse market dominance to force CONTINUATION to be implemented where it is neither needed nor desired. If you prefer, I can use the term "mafia-methods" rather than "blackmail" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 07:15:09 UTC